1.中山大学地理科学与规划学院,广东 广州 510006
2.贵阳学院城乡规划与建筑工程学院,贵州 贵阳 550005
3.广东省公共安全与灾害工程技术研究中心 / 广东省城市化与地理环境空间模拟重点实验室,广东 广州 510006
4.肇庆市统计局,广东 肇庆 526040
李宇珅(1988年生),女;研究方向:城市地理学;E-mail:liysh66@mail2.sysu.edu.cn
刘晔(1986年生),男;研究方向:人口、健康和城市地理学;E-mail:liuye25@mail.sysu.edu.cn
纸质出版日期:2024-01-25,
网络出版日期:2023-12-28,
收稿日期:2022-07-06,
录用日期:2022-12-16
扫 描 看 全 文
李宇珅,刘晔,黄柏石等.肇庆市老年人口健康水平的人居环境影响因素[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版)(中英文),2024,63(01):45-55.
LI Yushen,LIU Ye,HUANG Baishi,et al.Health determination of the human settlement environment of the elderly population in Zhaoqing[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni,2024,63(01):45-55.
李宇珅,刘晔,黄柏石等.肇庆市老年人口健康水平的人居环境影响因素[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版)(中英文),2024,63(01):45-55. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.acta.snus.2022D039.
LI Yushen,LIU Ye,HUANG Baishi,et al.Health determination of the human settlement environment of the elderly population in Zhaoqing[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni,2024,63(01):45-55. DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.acta.snus.2022D039.
基于2020年肇庆市乡镇街道地理尺度的人口普查数据,运用描述性统计方法揭示肇庆市老年人口健康水平的群体差异和空间格局,采用Tobit回归模型识别影响老年人口健康水平的人居环境要素,并探讨了多维人居环境要素对老年人口健康水平可能存在的混杂影响。结果表明:1)肇庆市城镇老年人口的健康水平优于乡村,老年人口健康水平存在性别差异,70岁后呈现女性健康优势被男性反转的特征。2)老年人口的健康水平呈现东南高西北低的特征,在城区、城关镇、建制镇组成的城市内部空间结构中存在等级分异格局。3)PM
2.5
和地区健康老人比例有显著的负相关关系,年均绿量对健康老人比例的影响并不显著,但却在乡村地区年均绿量可以缓解PM
2.5
和健康老人比例的负相关关系,污染企业数量和区域贫困剥夺指标则会加剧PM
2.5
对乡村健康老人比例的负向影响;优质的住房条件有助于提高健康老年人比例,医疗床位数、无主要收入来源、贫困剥夺、高龄对健康老人比例呈负向的预测作用。
Based on the seventh national census data
this study utilizes descriptive statistical analysis and the Tobit regression model to depict the spatial pattern of townships and identify the factors regarding human settlement that affect the health of the elderly population in Zhaoqing
Guangdong Province. The results are as follows: 1) The health level of the urban elderly population was better than that of rural areas in Zhaoqing. Moreover
the gap between urban and rural areas becomes more pronounced with age and the health advantage for women over men after the age of 70 has been reversed. 2) The spatial characteristics of a healthy environment reveal the uneven distribution of environmental resources. There were noticeable spatial and urban-rural differences in the health level of the elderly population
generally showing a pattern of high in urban areas and low in urban areas. 3) Air quality (PM
2.5
) has a significant negative correlation with the proportion of healthy elderly. Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) plays a positive role in regulating PM
2.5
in rural areas
while the number of polluting enterprises and poverty deprivation aggravate the negative impact of PM
2.5
on rural health elderly. High-quality housing conditions have a significant positive impact on the health status of the elderly; economic status without primary income and social deprivation negatively predicted the proportion of healthy elderly; the proportion of the senior elderly (
>
80 years) has a negative impact on the proportion of healthy elderly. Medical security has a positive impact on the health of the disabled elderly in rural areas. This study provides the theoretical basis and decision-making reference for Zhaoqing City to promote the construction of a livable environment for the elderly.
老年人口健康水平人居环境人口普查Tobit回归模型
elderly populationhealth levelhuman settlementcensusthe Tobit regression model
艾斌,2022.老年人健康不平等的发展趋势研究[J].人口与经济,(4):42-60.
敖荣军,李浩慈,杨振,等,2017.老年人口健康的空间分异及影响因素研究——以湖北省为例[J].地理科学进展,36(10):1218-1228.
国家卫生健康委,2021. 2020年度国家老龄事业发展公报[EB/OL].http://www.nhc.gov.cnlljksnew_index.shtmlhttp://www.nhc.gov.cnlljksnew_index.shtml.
国家卫生健康委,2022.关于印发“十四五”健康老龄化规划的通知[EB/OL].中华人民共和国中央人民政府:http://www.gov.cnhttp://www.gov.cn.
陈强,2015.计量经济学及Stata应用[M].北京:高等教育出版社:239-241.
陈玉洁,袁媛,周钰荃,等,2020.蓝绿空间暴露对老年人健康的邻里影响——以广州市为例[J].地理科学,40(10):1679-1687.
丁宏,成前,倪润哲,2018.城镇化的不平等、市民化与居民健康水平[J].南开经济研究,(6):20-35.
符建华,曹晓晨,2021.人口老龄化对中国经济高质量发展的影响研究[J].经济问题探索,(6):44-55.
高相铎,陈天,孟兆阳,2018. “乡村人”视角的城乡关系转型及规划策略——基于天津典型村庄的生活体验式调查[J].城市规划,42(8):29-35.
高晓路, 吴丹贤, 许泽宁, 等. 中国老龄化地理学综述和研究框架构建 [J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(12): 1480-94.
广东省统计局,2021.广东统计年鉴[G].北京:中国统计出版社:4-5.
黄柏石,李思思,仝广乾,等,2020.中国老年人口自评健康水平的空间分异及影响因素研究[J].人文地理,35(3) :37-47.
林宝,2021.积极应对人口老龄化:内涵、目标和任务[J].中国人口科学,(3) :42-55+127.
马静,周创文,PRYCE G,2019.环境公正视角下空气污染和死亡人数的空间分析及关系研究——以河北省为例[J].人文地理,34(6) :45-52+98.
潘泽瀚,吴连霞,卓冲,等,2022. 2010—2020年中国老年人口健康水平空间格局演变及其影响因素[J].地理学报,77(12) :3072-3089.
王春程,罗小龙,2022.中部地区“边缘化”的小城镇发展:对湖南省岳阳市城镇化的思考[J].现代城市研究,(8) :99-105.
王洋,金利霞,张虹鸥,等,2017.广州市居民住房条件的空间分异格局与形成机制[J].地理科学,37(6):868-875.
吴良镛,2018.加强人居环境规划建设管理与教育科研工作的思考[J].人类居住,(4):3-4.
于一凡,刘旭辉,2021.建成环境健康影响研究的行为变量及其中介效应——以上海市社区老年人的健康行为为例[J].科技导报,39(8):94-101.
赵雪雁,王伟军,万文玉,2017.中国居民健康水平的区域差异:2003-2013[J].地理学报,72(4):685-698.
郑振华,彭希哲,2019.社区环境对老年人行为与健康的影响研究——不同年龄阶段老年人的群组比较[J].地理研究,38(6):1481-1496.
周广肃,樊纲,申广军,2014.收入差距、社会资本与健康水平——基于中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)的实证分析[J].管理世界,(7):12-21+51+187.
周素红,张琳,林荣平,2020.地理环境暴露与公众健康研究进展[J].科技导报,38(7):43-52.
ADAMS J, RYAN V, WHITE M,2004. How accurate are Townsend Deprivation Scores as predictors of self-reported health?A comparison with individual level data[J]. J Public Health,27(1):101-106.
BROWNING M, RIGOLON A,2018. Do income,race and ethnicity,and sprawl influence the greenspace-human health link in city-level analyses?Findings from 496 cities in the United States[J].Int J Environ Res Public Health,15(7):1541.
DAVERN M, WINTERTON R, BRASHER K, et al,2020. How can the lived environment support healthy ageing? A spatial indicators framework for the assessment of age-friendly communities[J].Int J Environ Res Public Health,17(20):7685.
FAN H, WANG Y, WANG Y, et al, 2022. The impact of environmental pollution on the physical health of middle-aged and older adults in China[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 29(3) :4219-4231.
GU J, MING X, 2021. The influence of living conditions on self-rated health: Evidence from China[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18(17): 9200.
HE Q, ZHANG M, SONG Y, et al,2021. Spatiotemporal assessment of PM2.5 concentrations and exposure in China from 2013 to 2017 using satellite-derived data[J]. J Clean Prod, 286:124965.
KLOMPMAKER J O, JANSSEN N A H, BLOEMSMA L D, et al,2019. Residential surrounding green, air pollution, traffic noise and self-perceived general health[J]. Environ Res,179:108751.
LI Z, CHRISTENSEN G M, LAH J J, et al, 2022. Neighborhood characteristics as confounders and effect modifiers for the association between air pollution exposure and subjective cognitive functioning[J].Environ Res,212:113221.
LIU L, YAN L L, LV Y, et al, 2022. Air pollution, residential greenness, and metabolic dysfunction biomarkers: Analyses in the Chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey[J]. BMC Public Health, 22(1):885.
MARKEY C, BELLO O, HANLEY M, et al,2023. The use of area-level socioeconomic indices in evaluating cancer care delivery: A scoping review[J]. Ann Surg Oncol,30(5):2620-2628.
MITCHELL R, POPHAM F,2008. Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: An observational population study[J]. Lancet, 372(9650):1655-1660.
OKSUZYAN A, JUEL K, VAUPEL J W, et al, 2008. Men: good health and high mortality. Sex differences in health and aging[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res, 20(2):91-102.
OUYANG Y, CAI H, YU X, et al, 2022. Capitalization of social infrastructure into China's urban and rural housing values: Empirical evidence from Bayesian Model Averaging[J]. Econ Model, 107:105706.
POORTINGA W, DUNSTAN F, FONE D,2008. Neighbourhood deprivation and self-rated health: The role of perceptions of the neighbourhood and of housing problems[J]. Health Place, 14(3):562-575.
RICHARDSON E A, PEARCE J, MITCHELL R,et al,2013. A regional measure of neighborhood multiple environmental deprivation: Relationships with health and health inequalities[J]. Prof Geogr,65(1):153-170.
SCHÜLE S A, HILZ L K, DREGER S, et al, 2019. Social inequalities in environmental resources of green and blue spaces: A review of evidence in the WHO European region[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 16(7):1216.
STEPHENS C, SZABÓ Á, ALLEN J, et al,2019. Livable environments and the quality of life of older people: An ecological perspective[J].Gerontologist, 59(4):675-685.
WAN C, SU S, 2016. Neighborhood housing deprivation and public health: Theoretical linkage, empirical evidence, and implications for urban planning[J].Habit Int,57:11-23.
WHO, 2015. China country assessment report on ageing and health[EB/OL]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241509312https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241509312.
0
浏览量
7
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构