1. 浙江大学建工学院水文与水资源工程研究所,浙江,杭州,310058
2.
3. Department of Civil Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong
4. 西北勘测设计研究院,陕西,西安,710065
纸质出版日期:2009,
网络出版日期:2009-11-25,
扫 描 看 全 文
许月萍, 汤有光. 尺度模型在水文频率分析中的应用[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版)(中英文), 2009,48(6):127-131.
XU Yueping, TUNG Yeoukoung. Application of Scale Model in Hydrological Frequency Analysis [J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis SunYatseni, 2009,48(6):127-131.
简要介绍了一种新的结合物理过程的尺度模型,并分析比较了应用尺度模型和传统频率分析方法(即直接计算法)来计算设计降雨的优劣势。使用香港新界北雨量站数据,发现尺度模型在降雨历时120
360
720和1 440 min范围内比较合理,计算得出的设计降雨比直接计算法得出的要小,且随着重现期的增加,两者的差异也相应地增加。结合了物理特性的尺度模型相较直接计算法更加合理,可以作为传统频率分析方法的一种替代或补充方案来计算设计降雨值。
Incorporating physical characteristics of processes in hydrological analysis is one of the focuses of hydrological field. A scale model is introduced and its merits and limitations in calculating design rainfall depths
compared to traditional frequency analysis (direct method)
are analyzed in this paper. The data were collected from rainfall gauges of Hong Kong New Territory. It is found that the scale model is applicable for rainfall durations of 120
360
720 and 1 440 min. The calculated rainfall depths are smaller than those from the direct method. The differences between rainfall depths increase with return periods. It is concluded that the scale model is more reasonable than traditional frequency analysis and can be used as an alternative or complement to design rainfall depth calculation.
直接计算法尺度模型设计降雨
direct methodscale modeldesign rainfall depths
0
浏览量
112
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621
